Skip to content
Version 1.3
Login

INVEST 101 - Introduction to INVEST

Sustainable Transportation Curriculum for Universities

Slide 1

INVEST - Sustainable Highways Self-Evaluation Tool (logo).

INVEST 101: Introduction to INVEST

Slide 2

Rating Systems for Infrastructure

Prominent sustainability infrastructure rating systems:

  1. BE2ST-in-Highways
  2. Envision
  3. GreenLITES
  4. Greenroads
  5. I-LAST
  6. INVEST

These systems employ different methods of determining sustainability, emphasizing different sustainable factors.

Aerial view of a highway interchange.

Slide 3

INVEST — Infrastructure Voluntary Evaluation Sustainability Tool

Slide 4

INVEST — Infrastructure Voluntary Evaluation Sustainability Tool (Continued)

Screenshot of the landing page for the INVEST website, accessible at www.sustainablehighways.org.

Slide 5

Why Measure Sustainability?

Track and assess progress

Encourage broad participation of stakeholders

Evaluate sustainability of trade-offs

Meet or anticipate new requirements

Find and address programmatic barriers

Communicate benefits and goals

Using INVEST To Accomplish Your Goals | INVEST — Sustainable Highways Self-Evaluation Tool | Federal Highway Administration

Slide 6

Benefits

Improve sustainability of specific transportation projects

Keep projects on track to meet sustainability goals

Provide contractors with incentives for implementing sustainability

Source: https://www.sustainablehighways.org/1590/benefits.html

Project icon. Goals icon. Incentives icon.

Slide 7

INVEST has modules to evaluate the sustainability of transportation projects throughout the project life cycle.

It helps prioritize and communicate balanced choices between different goals of transportation plans, programs, and projects.

The image represents the project lifecycle as represented in INVEST, starting with system planning, followed by project development, and operations and maintenance.

Slide 8

INVEST Criteria

This image shows a snippet of the Project Development criterion on Stormwater and Flow Control from the INVEST Compendium. The affected <abbr class='tooltip' title='A measurement in three areas, environmental, economic, and social, intended to advance towards the goal of sustainability.' >triple bottom line</abbr> principle for this criterion is the environmental one.
This image shows a snippet of the System Planning for States criterion on Access and Affordability from the INVEST Compendium. The affected triple bottom line principle for this criterion is the environmental, social and economic.
This image shows a snippet of the Project Development criterion on Stormwater and Flow Control from the INVEST Compendium. The affected triple bottom line principle for this criterion is the social and economic one.
Screenshot of the Operations & Maintenance criterion on Electrical Energy Efficiency and Use from the INVEST Compendium. The affected triple bottom line principle for this criterion is the environmental and economic one.

Slide 9

Criterion Scoring Example

Detailed background and scoring requirements are provided for each applicable criterion. Users then select responses to questions based on this guidance to determine the scores. Collaboration among stakeholders is vital to the scoring process.

Screenshot of part of the online INVEST interface for criterion scoring. It shows an example of how the goal statement, sustainability linkage, and background scoring requirements are listed, in this example for the Project Development criterion on Lifecycle Cost Analyses.

Slide 10

Criterion Scoring Example (Continued)

Detailed background and scoring requirements are provided for each applicable criterion. Users then select responses to questions based on this guidance to determine the scores. Collaboration among stakeholders is vital to the scoring process.

This image shows part of the online INVEST interface for criterion scoring. It shows how users can select scoring options using radio buttons, which result in specific points being scored.

Slide 11

INVEST Scoring

  • Depending on the project or program being evaluated, a set of criteria are applicable
  • Projects may receive a Bronze, Silver, Gold, or Platinum rating for achieving 30%, 40%, 50%, and 60% or more, respectively, of the total achievable score for the relevant module
  • Scoring can be done online on the INVEST website or offline by downloading fillable worksheets
The image represents vehicles on a road with on-board units for connectivity.

Slide 12

INVEST Scoring Example

This image shows part of the online INVEST interface showing how the total score for a scorecard is displayed. In this case, the results are for a project development module's urban basic scorecard, and shows a rating of 41 points, or Bronze.

Slide 13

CASE STUDY — Planning

  • MetroPlan Orlando, the MPO for central Florida, applied INVEST to help address health and sustainability in regional planning
  • Evaluation of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan was conducted using INVEST's Systems Planning for Regions Module
  • Received a Gold rating (129 out of 255 possible points)

Source: https://www.sustainablehighways.org/779/97/metroplan-orlando-integrating-health-and-sustainability-principles-into-transportation-planning.html

Freeway interchange near a city's downtown area.

MetroPlan Orlando (logo).

Slide 14

Case Study — Planning (continued)

Key Outcomes

Identification of areas of success and for improvement

Helped develop a multi-year health and sustainability approach

New relationships and enhanced relationships with non-traditional transportation partners

Increased support from elected and senior officials

Development of white papers

Identification of research topics

Source: https://www.sustainablehighways.org/779/97/metroplan-orlando-integrating-health-and-sustainability-principles-into-transportation-planning.html

Slide 15

CASE STUDY — Project Development and Construction

Ohio Department of Transportation (logo).

  • Ohio DOT included sustainability (measured by INVEST) as one of the criteria for scoring contractor proposals for a design-build contract for the second phase of the George V. Voinovich Bridge
    • Winning bid committed to INVEST Platinum rating (95 INVEST points out of a total possible of 126)

Source: https://www.sustainablehighways.org/779/94/ohio-dot-george-v-voinovich-bridgecleveland-innerbelt-corridor.html

View from the water of a bridge under construction.

Slide 16

CASE STUDY — Project Development and Construction (continued)

  • Collaborative workshop (eco-charette) was used to identify areas for improvement
  • Selected outcomes
    • Reuse of materials
    • Earthwork balance to eliminate excess fill
    • Diversion of most of the construction waste

Source: https://www.sustainablehighways.org/779/94/ohio-dot-george-v-voinovich-bridgecleveland-innerbelt-corridor.html

Engineers in an office looking over plans.

Slide 17

CASE STUDY — Operations and Maintenance

Arizona Department of Transportation (logo).

  • ADOT conducted an evaluation of internal operations and infrastructure operations and maintenance areas using INVEST
  • ADOT achieved a platinum rating, based on the self-evaluation

Source: https://www.sustainablehighways.org/779/78/arizona-dot-using-invest-to-benefit-planning-programming-and-maintenance-in-arizona.html

Flagger working at a road construction work zone.

Slide 18

CASE STUDY — Operations and Maintenance (Continued)

High-Scoring Areas

  • Vehicle fuel efficiency and use
  • Pavement management system
  • Transportation management and operations
  • Work zone traffic control

Areas for Improvement

  • Sustainability plan
  • Electrical energy efficiency and use
  • Tracking environmental commitments
  • Bridge management system
  • Road weather management program

Source: https://www.sustainablehighways.org/779/78/arizona-dot-using-invest-to-benefit-planning-programming-and-maintenance-in-arizona.html

Slide 19 [end]

INVEST 101: Introduction to INVEST